TIL: how to handle legal-ish problems in MA

TIL (Today I Learned) is a new category that lets me capture the random sh-…stuff I learn while “living anyway”.

Today’s fun topic is, “You don’t have to hire a lawyer when your employer is screwing you. You can contact the Attorney General’s office and let them handle it.”

This is based on Massachusetts. This is widely considered a blue state, but it has usually had a Republican governor until recently. What we are, is a well-educated state. We tend to vote for smart people. That suits me.

The A. G. has a job to do

From an ordinary American’s point of view, the Attorney General’s Office exists to protect you from bad-faith dealings with those who are in a position to screw you pretty badly: employers and businesses. Not only do they need to follow the law, like we all do, but they need to keep their activities from skating too close to the edge of it.

The A.G.’s job is to provide access to protection from so-called “bad actors”, and to intervene when it’s needed.

In case you wondered.

First, we’ll look at employment law.

The A. G. handles employers who behave badly to employees

If your employer is:

  • Stiffing you for pay or benefits you’ve earned,
  • Crossing the line on hours required or how you’re supposed to work,
  • Failing to provide safety gear for the job, from PPE to jack-lines and harnesses,
  • Refuses adaptations(*) for your sight, hearing, movement, or typing problems so that you can do your work – which you’re qualified for and able to do with reasonable accommodations,
  • Etc.!

Then…

Start by collecting your evidence – emails, work schedules, time cards, photos or footage, text messages, relevant pages from the company manual, and anything else that helps to tell the story. Get time and date clues in everything, whenever possible.

Write out the problem. (It’s a great idea to write a first draft with all the emotions and bad language first. It’s good to get that out of the way to clear the mind a bit.)

Facts, facts, facts, one after the other. The facts alone will tell your story. A word or two about your essential motivation is good, though – e.g., “Fearing for my safety, I refused to do that task without proper gear” is a useful statement of what informed that decision. Consequences matter. That’s a fact!

If you peel off the emotional impact of what was done to you, it leaves All The Room for the emotional impact of events on the reader. That is a lot more powerful than all the descriptions of feelings ever.

Then, take a look at this page and upload your report when you’re ready

https://www.mass.gov/how-to/file-a-workplace-complaint

They’ll be in touch and either take the case to court or guide you on whatever next steps are most appropriate. They may advise suing and will suggest lawyers who will take the case on contingency – meaning, you give them a 30% cut if you win (even though they do most of the work), or nothing at all if you lose.

(*)A note on adaptations and disability

Thanks to many years of effort by people like you & me, the Americans with Disabilities Act was passed in 1990 (1 year before I became a Registered Nurse) and then, after 18 years of experience, was updated in 2008 (3 years after I became too crippled to work) so that its requirements were clearer and so there were fines and consequences for not following it.

Since disabled people have been one of the last legally and socially acceptable targets of prejudice (especially at work), this legislation was historic indeed.

The current text of the ADA is here:

https://www.ada.gov/law-and-regs/ada/

At the federal level, this law is under attack. Here is the latest:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/airlines-disabled-passengers-wheelchairs/

This is the most accessible of the articles I found about this.

Those of you who are familiar with wheelchair-riders know just how expensive, valuable, and necessary these things are. Some of you (like me) know people who’ve lost the use of their chairs because of damage by airlines. It’s unthinkable to us, but it happened a lot; was finally addressed; and now that protection is at risk. Call your legislators if you care about this:

https://www.usa.gov/elected-officials

If you’ve had a disability – or other right-to-access – issue that seems illegal or seriously wrong, then go to the Civil Rights page of the AGO, where they handle all the issues of social injustice – disability, religion, race, gender, and so on – and follow the procedure:

https://www.mass.gov/how-to/file-a-civil-rights-complaint

Consumer (not employee) complaints

Hot tip: if you’re being screwed over by a business you bought goods or services from, the same approach applies: go to the AGO and funnel your issue into the Consumer Complaint division.

In MA, that journey starts here:

https://www.mass.gov/how-to/file-a-consumer-complaint

It might take a couple of months to get to the top of the pile, but they will open negotiations if you’ve written a clear, factual complaint. (I’m naturally assuming all my readers would only submit legitimate reports of unjust treatment, though most sites will feel compelled to remind you not to submit frivolous complaints. As if we have that kind of time!)

When they call you to start negotiating, be patient and tactful – yet clear. No name-calling the opponent, no matter how much they deserve it. Let the facts speak for themselves. Walk through each step of the process and let it unfold, because the negotiator hasn’t been what you’ve been through and they need to learn what that jerk you’re dealing with is like, for themselves.

I say this only because I have a little trouble with it myself. Pain-brain makes it hard to be detached, but it’s worth the effort.

In short…

The Attorney General’s Office has your back.

If they don’t, we’ve all got a much bigger problem.

Fully-qualified human beings

When I was working in the software industry, the term “fully-qualified” entered my world in a marvelously exact way.

The specific programmatic terminology here is from the Java programming language. Don’t let it bother you – some things are just details.

Java uses an organizing category called “classes” for unique bundles of code that define all the features, characteristics, and actions that this bundle of code needs in order to do what its name says it will do. (Other programming languages may have other terms.)

Each class has to have all the parts it needs to know when it’s wanted, what it needs to look for, what it has to do, when it has to stop, and what (if anything) should happen next.

If a class is completely and properly defined in all these parameters (and sometimes more), then it’s called a “fully-qualified” class. It can be trusted and can be used across multiple regions.

Not all classes are fully-qualified. They’re okay for quick tasks and have a place in the Java ecosystem, but their usefulness is limited. Those classes, those hunks of code, usually have to be filled out to be fully-qualified or else deleted when the time comes to prepare a program for market.

Any robust program needs an awful lot of classes of many different types. It’s inefficient to have too many similar classes — you’ve got to have different classes to do different tasks. All that they have to have in common (besides logical coherence) is that they must be properly constructed so they can do their task — whatever their particular task is.

This diversity of classes is essential to good programming.

You’re starting to see the metaphor here, aren’t you…

Some people view all others as fully-qualified human beings.

Some people do not. Only a few meet their idea of fully-qualified — that is, complete and correct and fully able to function as they should. This, naturally, means that they have specific and limited ideas of what humans need to do.

When people beat on those who diverge from their idea of truly human (those targets are usually women or gender-bending or people with disabilities or people of color or poor people) they’re acting on the fact that they don’t see these other people as fully-qualified human beings.

The people doing the beating-on are hung up on the feeling that these people are not properly “written”, that they’re missing huge hunks of “code” that limits their function — and makes them fair game for being taken out, sidelined or deleted.

We aren’t all the same, and nor should we be. It’d be a terrible program if we were, and would quickly choke on its own redundancy, crashing itself and possibly blue-screening the whole show.

Maybe we should go back to the old CRT colors and make it orange-screening.

What do you think? Too bold?

Foggy… and formats

There’s been a lot going on, but I’m not up to discussing it for lots of reasons, but mostly, TBH, because I’m foggy.

I’m thinking about how to put my work together differently. Like, make it easy to focus on overarching topics – traveling with illness and pain; navigating relationships; communicating with loved ones; getting your message through to doctors; handling flares; laughing at the absurdities of this life; being a smart-aleck when appropriate; coping when it’s hard to keep going… these are specific subjects, and it’s not good to hit an unsuspecting system with a surprise ttopic.i don’t think category tags are sufficient warning. We should be able to choose our topics upfront.

So, I’m mulling Patreon or books or some other way of putting out my work so it gets organized into logical groups. You should still be able to find the most recent if you want to, and go in reverse chronological order; it’s just that that should not be forced on the reader the way a normal blog organization does it.

Not sure I’m explaining myself well. Like I said… foggy.

What do you think? Is there a subset or grouping you’d like to see? There are a lot of ways I could organize it – do you have a favorite format?

I’d love to hear what you think! Feel free to comment or whatever.

 

Neuro reset FTW

I’m working on building up stamina because being a blob doesn’t agree with me.

I had one of our rare, hard-won, absolutely stunning neuro physiotherapy sessions yesterday. It usually takes time (days or even weeks) for my body to embrace the resetting, but this one is showing up fast.

Until last week, walking a bit too far would wipe me out.

When I was well, walking lifted my spirits and calmed my mind, and “too far” had more to do with comfort & convenience than anything more pressing.

For most of my illness, walking helped in the aggregate – if I kept it up, I did better over time. It was good, and I was glad to do it, but…

I’d forgotten, until today, just how lovely it was possible to feel after a good walk.

Yes, I’ve overdone a bit, and I’m open to the idea of staying in tomorrow & taking it easy.

I just… I haven’t had a workout high in… dear heavens, I can’t even remember. Decades, possibly.

Must remember to send this link to my physiotherapist. She’ll be:

A. Over the moon for me.

B. Reminding me to drink a lot of water and put my feet up for a bit.

It’s hard to keep it all in perspective – to celebrate this properly, without falling into the old trap of ignoring all the ongoing work it took to get here; to keep it up & stay honest about the jungle of limits I still have to negotiate.

Good day, though, eh? Really, really good. My heart is as light as the feather of Ma’at…

New times; new topics

For audio version (with extra fun stuff), touch this sentence.

I’m not going to mention current events in my country.

This is a series about traveling…

Traveling in interesting ways.

The ADHD is strong in this one:

If a thing is interesting, it is ever so much more bearable.

If I were to travel, I would like to bring my pet.

I hear some of you shouting, “Why, you insufferable loon? Don’t you have enough to deal with??” (Sorry, Mom.)

For one thing, I like her company; for another, she keeps me on schedule and is really good at “body-doubling”, or hanging around to help me focus on a task. She literally holds the yarn while I crochet, and tracks the loose bits of thread when I’m sewing. Cats are supposed to be interfering, but she’s genuinely helpful.

Also… Traveling with a pet definitely makes this more interesting.

Chapter 1: pet passport

I was going to start with the effort to find a vet to make her travel certification happen. I’m not up to that right now.

Chapter 2: Trip planning

I’ve been reading up on alllllllll the aspects of this trip for a long time. Years, really, but most recently for about 3 weeks. It takes some noodling around just to find out if it’s impossible or just kinda weird.

In case it isn’t obvious, I’m okay with weird. Impossible takes a little longer.

Aspects to understand for planning a trip like this:

– The only way to get to my target continent is by air.

– Some airlines are pet-friendly.

– Some airlines that are pet-friendly for domestic flights somehow refuse to carry animals at all on international flights.

– Some airlines that are willing to carry animals on international flights, don’t allow them in the cabin. From my experiences before, I absolutely, flatly refuse to send a cat in the hold, regardless of the airline’s reputation. Never again.

– Am I overthinking/ over-explaining? I think I am.

Point is, there are all these layers and layers of information to dig through. I had to keep on digging through possibilities, then peel back the incompatible options, until everything finally got very simple.

Cats are not supposed to be in a carrier for more than about 7.5 hours. So, all I really had to do was get her from my airport to an airport less than 8 hours away; 3 to choose from. Flights within that other continent are all within that time frame, so the crossing was all that mattered.

Still with me? Good.

Flying into one of these 3 cities puts me at the heart of the high-speed rail line, something I’ve been coveting a ride on since it was first mooted roughly half a century ago.

At the other end of that high-speed rail line is a ferry ride, a 16-hour journey over one of the most adorable seas in the world, to an island that entrances me.

The total cost of the train and ferry (even with the pet) comes out to less than half the cost of another darned multi-leg plane trip *without* the pet, eating bad food, too far up to enjoy the scenery, and breathing other peoples’ air.

In short, if I were to organize such a trip, we’d have 3 modes of transport over 40 hours, lungfuls of fresh air, and moonlight on the Mediterranean to welcome me home.

I might love it. I might hate it and never want to do any of that again. Doesn’t matter from here… because it’s interesting, it’s affordable, and I want to give it a shot.